<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CES 2012 &#8211; Tech That Worked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.radioshack.com/2012/01/ces-2012-tech-that-worked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.radioshack.com/2012/01/ces-2012-tech-that-worked/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=ces-2012-tech-that-worked</link>
	<description>techspecs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 02:23:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Hernandez</title>
		<link>http://blog.radioshack.com/2012/01/ces-2012-tech-that-worked/#comment-35600</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Hernandez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.radioshack.com/?p=3212#comment-35600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would have taken the iPad 2 , and or The iPhone 4.  I m set with that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have taken the iPad 2 , and or The iPhone 4.  I m set with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky Cadden</title>
		<link>http://blog.radioshack.com/2012/01/ces-2012-tech-that-worked/#comment-35542</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky Cadden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 20:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.radioshack.com/?p=3212#comment-35542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, the iPod Classic surprises most, but it does precisely what I need, nothing more. Especially in an environment with limited power and connectivity, it&#039;s brilliant. I wish we would have met up, as well. There&#039;s always SXSW in a month or two!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the iPod Classic surprises most, but it does precisely what I need, nothing more. Especially in an environment with limited power and connectivity, it&#8217;s brilliant. I wish we would have met up, as well. There&#8217;s always SXSW in a month or two!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nan palmero</title>
		<link>http://blog.radioshack.com/2012/01/ces-2012-tech-that-worked/#comment-35541</link>
		<dc:creator>nan palmero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 20:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.radioshack.com/?p=3212#comment-35541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The iPod Classic is a surprise to me. I do love Slacker Radio and I don&#039;t care to buy music, so it would be a no go. Everything else makes sense. Wish we could have bumped into one another there!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The iPod Classic is a surprise to me. I do love Slacker Radio and I don&#8217;t care to buy music, so it would be a no go. Everything else makes sense. Wish we could have bumped into one another there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
